Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Title IX Changes May Be on the Horizon ... Again

On March 8, President Biden issued a new executive order that requires Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to examine the Title IX regulations that went into effect on August 14, 2020. Cardona’s review will likely result in changes to the Department of Education’s Title IX guidance. This is not surprising because in May 2020, then-Education Secretary Betsy DeVos released new Title IX regulations that reversed Obama-era guidance and President Biden was critical of these changes during his campaign last year.

Within 100 days, Cardona must review all of the Education Department’s regulations, orders, guidance documents, and policies to ensure they do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Specifically, Cardona was directed to analyze the department’s policy on Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and “consider suspending, revising or rescinding” any policies that fail to protect students from discrimination on the basis of sex.

The current Title IX regulations departed from the Obama administration’s policies on campus sexual assault and harassment in many important ways. Of particular note, under the current Title IX regulations, a school may apply the “clear and convincing” evidence standard when deciding whether sexual misconduct took place on campus. Contrastingly, the Obama administration required schools to apply the lower “preponderance of evidence” standard. The introduction of a higher standard of evidence drew criticism from those who believe the current regulations were drafted with an eye on advantaging accused students. Similarly, the current regulations’ live hearing and cross-examination requirements conflicted with Obama-era guidance, which discouraged cross-examination. The Biden administration will likely attempt to reverse these changes.

President Biden’s executive order also signals that his administration may announce a broad interpretation of Title IX that reaches additional forms of sex discrimination. Indeed, the executive order points out that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity may intersect with “forms of prohibited discrimination that can affect the availability of resources and support for students who have experienced sex discrimination.” It therefore seems likely that the Biden administration will require schools’ Title IX policies to expressly extend to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Exactly what changes the Biden administration intends to make to the current Title IX regulations and how quickly it could make those changes is unclear. As we saw under the Trump administration, the rule-making process is lengthy and it could take years for a new rule to go into effect. Groups that supported the Trump administration’s changes will almost certainly take action to try to stop changes proposed by the Biden administration. However, if the administration wishes to effect change more quickly, it could either seek a stay of the new rule or choose not to defend the numerous pending lawsuits that are challenging it. If there is a stay of the new rule, the Biden administration could publish interim guidance that revives the Obama administration’s guidance.

For now, schools should leave their current policies in place unless or until the current regulations are rescinded. It will be important to keep watch for developments over the next several months as Cardona conducts his review.

Authored By
Related Practices
Education
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.