Skip to Content

Implementing Executive Order, FTC Calls on Public and Regulated Community to Identify Anticompetitive Regulations for Potential Repeal

The second Trump administration has issued a slew of deregulatory measures aimed at turbocharging the reduction of regulatory bloat (EO 14192, requiring the repeal of 10 regulations for every new one issued), ensuring regulations conform with (in its view) the Constitution, federal law, and Supreme Court jurisprudence (EO 14219), and that all federal regulators — employed at heretofore “independent” agencies or not — are responsive to the president’s deregulatory philosophy (EO 14215, requiring presidential approval for all rulemaking initiatives). A major new initiative focuses on the impact of federal regulation on competition, placing the nation’s top antitrust enforcers at the center of a governmentwide project to identify for repeal “regulations that reduce competition, entrepreneurship, and innovation.”

Executive order 14267, titled “Reducing Anti-Competitive Regulatory Barriers,” spells out a four-part process for identifying and repealing (or amending) regulations that fit this bill. First, the heads of all federal agencies, working together with the chair of the Federal Trade Commission (Andrew Ferguson) and the attorney general (Pam Bondi), are directed by mid-June 2025 to “complete a review of all regulations subject to their rulemaking authority and identify those that” create or preserve barriers to competition, forestall market entry, or otherwise reduce competition or innovation.

Next, agency heads must submit lists identifying anticompetitive regulations to the FTC chair and attorney general, recommending whether “each of the listed regulations warrants rescission or modification in light of its anti-competitive effects,” and specifying proposed amendments where appropriate. Agencies must also justify in writing the non-inclusion of anticompetitive regulations, when not selected for amendment or recission.

The FTC chair and attorney general then have 90 days (through mid-September 2025) to provide a “consolidated list of regulations that warrant rescission or modification … along with recommended modifications” to the Office of Management and Budget. Finally, the OMB determines whether to include the recommendations in the Unified Regulatory Agenda developed pursuant to executive order 14219, which would kick off the formal process for amendment or repeal.  

The executive order requests the public’s assistance in finding regulatory candidates suitable for the administration’s chopping block. Toward that end, the FTC has issued a request for information. The public has until May 27, 2025, to submit comments identifying regulations that “exclude new market entrants, protect dominant incumbents, and predetermine economic winners and losers” and the basis for their listing.

Carlton Fields is at the leading edge of helping companies navigate the ongoing changes to the administrative state imposed by the new administration. If there are industry regulations calling out for repeal, contact the author of this article or your usual firm contact, as, at least in modern times, the environment for deregulation has never been more hospitable.

©2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.