Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending April 5, 2019

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure / Standing: bank cannot rely solely on its acquisition of prior lenderto prove standing where note was specially indorsed to prior lender - Certo v. The Bank of New York Mellon, No. 1D17-4421 (Fla. 1st DCA Apr. 3, 2019) (reversed and remanded)
  • Foreclosure / Self-Authentication: loan modification agreements are self-authenticating under section 90.902(8), Florida Statutes and should have led trial court to enter final judgment of foreclosure in favor of bank - Wells Fargo v. Quest Sys. LLC, No. 2D17-1184 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 3, 2019) (reversed and remanded)
  • Foreclosure Sale: notice to attorney of record constitutes notice to attorney's client for the purpose of due process regarding notice of hearing on borrower's objections to the conduct of a foreclosure sale - Waldman v. Laquer Family Holdings, No. 3D18-2116 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 3, 2019) (affirmed)
  • Foreclosure / Standing: presumption of standing applies where lender files original note in same condition as copy attached to its complaint, even where the loan number on copy of note has been redacted - Kronen v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., No. 4D18-1137 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 3, 2019) (affirmed)

Title Insurance Update

  • Equitable Subrogation / Fraud: lender was entitled to equitable subrogation even if signature of co-borrower had been forged on mortgage - Wells Fargo, N.A. v. Dalfin, No. 2016-0511, 169 A.D.3d 970 (N.Y. App. 2d Dept. Feb. 20, 2019) (granting summary judgment)
  • Negligence / Negligent Search: title insurer not liable on negligent search claim where title insurer had already paid insured full policy limits on insured's claim - Friedberg v. Bullard, No. 2:18-cv-00061 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 6, 2019) (granting summary judgment)
  • Timeshares / Insuring Multistate Timeshares: title insurer that insured interests in timeshare properties entitled to dismissal because claim was not ripe since insureds had not made claims on their title policy and because Florida statutes allowed a valid real property interest in a multistate timeshare - Lenmen v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., No. 6:16-cv-855-Orl-41TBS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 31, 2019) (granting dismissal)
  • Bad Faith: title insurer's three-page denial letter explained in detail, with legal citation, why marketability claim based on mechanic's liens was not covered - Culley v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 18-cv-40099-DHH (D. Mass. Mar. 29, 2019) (granting dismissal of bad faith claim)
  • Closing Agent Fraud / Damages: "willful and wanton" instruction on contributory negligence defense misstated the law, and damages were not reduced to account for loss of market value of properties between purchase and foreclosure sale of fraudulently flipped properties, since economic downturn was not sufficiently connected to escrow agent's misconduct - FDIC v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., No. 12-cv-05198 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 31, 2019) (granting motion for new trial)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.