Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property & Financial Services Update: Week Ending May 31, 2019

Real Property Update

  • Public Official Standing Doctrine: county school district that benefited from ad valorem taxes charged by county could not challenge constitutionality of statutory tax exemption claimed by homeowners association - The School District of Escambia Cnty., Fla. v. Santa Rosa Dunes Owners Ass'n, Inc., No. 1D18-91 (Fla. 1st DCA May 30, 2019) (affirmed)
  • Foreclosure / Deficiency Judgment: because borrowers were only constructively served with process, trial court lacked in personam jurisdiction necessary to enter deficiency judgment against borrowers - Rosenhaim v HMC Assets, as Trustee, No. 5D18-1929 (Fla. 5th DCA May 31, 2019) (affirmed, with comment)
  • Insurance Contract / Consequential Damages: insured permitted to pursue claim against insurer for lost rental income, even though policy provided for property damage coverage but not for lost rent - Manor House LLC v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., No. 5D17-2841 (Fla. 5th DCA May 31, 2019) (reversing in part summary judgment in insurer's favor)

Financial Services Update

  • TCPA / Fax Advertisement: unsolicited fax asking healthcare provider to verify information in sender's database was not an actionable advertisement, as it did not attempt to influence the purchasing decisions of any potential buyer, and did not encourage provider to influence the purchasing decisions or those of a third party - Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. Optum Inc., No. 18-2894 (3d Cir. May 28, 2019) (affirming dismissal)
  • TCPA / Art. III Standing & Class Certification: applying Spokeo to conclude unwanted calls to residential numbers on Do Not Call registry received on multiple occasions satisfied Art. III, as § 227(c)(5) was enacted to protect particularized and concrete privacy interests; and upholding class certification because a plaintiff "is likely to be in the same position as a great many other people and can rely largely on common proof to make out his claim[ ]" - Krakauer v. Dish Network, LLC, No. 18-1518 (4th Cir. May 30, 2019) (affirming $61 million class action judgment)
  • FCRA / Consumer Reporting Agency: to qualify as a consumer reporting agency, entity must intend the information it furnishes to constitute a "consumer report," as defined under 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(f) - Kidd v. Thompson Reuters Corp., No. 17-3550 (2d Cir. May 30, 2019) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant)
  • FDCPA / False or Misleading Representation: collection letter that listed "total current balance" but did not state whether interest, late charges, or other charges were accruing did not violate 15 USC § 1692e because letter did not suggest amount owed was different than amount stated - Bella v. Bureaus Invest. Grp. Portfolio No. 15 LLC, No. 17-cv-6115 (E.D.N.Y. May 30, 2019) (dismissing with prejudice)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.