Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending September 27, 2019

Real Property Update

  • Construction Lien: a delinquency charge of 1.5 percent found in materialman's contract with general contractor is not a finance charge recoverable under the materialman lien statute, Florida Statutes section 713.06(1) - Fernandez v. Manning Bldg. Supplies, Inc., No. 1D18-4819 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 25, 2019) (affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded)
  • Partition: where property was titled as joint tenants with rights of survivorship and the facts created the presumption of a gift from one co-tenant to the other, the co-tenant paying the obligations of the property was entitled to a credit from the proceeds of the partition sale for the other co-tenant's proportionate share of those expenses - Fernandez v. Marrero, No. 3D16-2931 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 25, 2019) (affirmed and remanded)
  • Original Jurisdiction / Aggregation: plaintiffs, each former tenants in an apartment complex, not permitted to aggregate claim to meet the $15,000 threshold for circuit court jurisdiction, where the plaintiffs' claims were similar, but based on different factual situations - Bejarano v. City of Hollywood, No. 4D18-2613 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 25, 2019) (affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for transfer to the county court)
  • Partition / Attorney Fees: Florida Statutes section 57.041(1) mandates that the standard used to determine an award of court costs is the "party recovering judgment" and not the "prevailing party" standard - Sherman v. Sherman, No. 4D18-3578 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 25, 2019) (reversed and remanded)

Financial Services Update

  • TCPA / ATDS / Definition: TCPA's definition of ATDS compels conclusion that to constitute an ATDS, the system must possess the capacity to: (1) store telephone numbers using a random or sequential number generator; or (2) produce telephone numbers using a random or sequential number generator - Denova v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, No. 8:17-cv-02204 (M.D. Fla. Sep. 24, 2019) (reasoning that under ACA International, FCC's 2003 and 2008 declaratory rulings merit no deference)
  • TCPA / ATDS / Predictive Dialer: Ocwen's Aspect predictive dialer system does not constitute an ATDS under the TCPA - Denova v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, No. 8:17-cv-02204 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 24, 2019) (granting summary judgment against plaintiff)
  • FDCPA / False Service: practice of obtaining a default judgment by filing false affidavits of service is actionable under the FDCPA - Carroll v. U.S. Equities Corp., No. 1:18-cv-00667 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2019)

Title Insurance Update

  • Insured Legal Access: title insurer entitled to new trial on liability and damages on insured's claim for lack of access through an existing gated community and over the private roads contained therein where (i) in a prior action, insured had been granted easement by necessity through the gated community and over the roads therein; but (ii) trial court erroneously interpreted prior ruling as "finally determin[ing]" that insured had no right to enter and use the roads within the gated community - Rio Mesa Holdings, LLC v. Fidelity Nat'l Title Ins. Co., No. F074641 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 24, 2019) (reversed and remanded for new trial on liability and damages)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.