Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending December 24, 2021
December 28, 2021

Real Property Update

  • Devise of Homestead Property: Devise of Homestead Property: Decedent’s homestead property did not pass via decendent’s last will and testament because decedent made invalid devise of homestead property and thus homestead property passed immediately at decedent’s death to decedent’s spouse for life with a vested remainder interest in each of decedent’s sons, pursuant to statutory laws of intestacy – Ballard v. Pritchard, No. 2D20-2967 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 22, 2021) (reversed and remanded)

  • Receiver / Safe Harbor Protection: Plain language of safe harbor statute, section 718.116(1)(b)(1), which limits liability of a first mortgagee and its successors and assigns, for past due condominium assessments, applies to a receiver appointed at condominium association’s request – Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc’y, FSB v. Gulfstream of Las Olas Condo. Ass’n, Inc., No. 4D20-1443 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 22, 2021) (reversed and remanded)

Financial Services Update

  • FDCPA / Standing / Dissipation of Risk of Future Harm: Plaintiff failed to establish a sufficient injury in fact to establish standing to file suit where risk of future harm had dissipated before filing complaint; emotional distress alone is not a concrete injury to confer standing under the FDCPA – Toste v. Beach Club at Fontainebleau Park Condo. Ass’n, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-23771 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2021) (dismissing case with prejudice)

  • FDCPA / Standing / Emotional Distress: Emotional distress alone is not a concrete injury to confer standing under the FDCPA – Toste v. Beach Club at Fontainebleau Park Condo. Ass’n, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-23771 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2021) (dismissing case with prejudice)

  • TCPA / ATDS: Plaintiff’s allegations that defendant used an ATDS to contact customers failed under TCPA because the platform only contacted phone numbers specifically provided by consumers during registration process because the list was not populated randomly – Austria v. Alorica, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-05019 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2021) (granting motion to dismiss TCPA claim with prejudice)

  • FDCPA / Standing / Concrete Injury in Fact: Plaintiff’s allegations of “sewer service,” failing to serve a debtor and filing a fraudulent affidavit attesting to service so that when debtor later fails to appear in court, a default judgment can be entered, were sufficient to establish a concrete injury from the risk of harm the FDCPA was designed to protect against – Fleming v. Provest Cal. LLC, No. 5:21-cv-04462 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021) (denying motion to remand)

Title Insurance Update

  • Right of Access: Undefined term “access” in owner’s title insurance policy, which insured “right of access,” was ambiguous; thus, court construed same liberally in favor of insured to hold that pedestrian access was not sufficient access and that vehicular access was required – First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. GS Industries, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00078 (D. Haw. Dec. 16, 2021) (granting insured summary judgment; denying insurer summary judgment)
Related Practices
Real Property Litigation Consumer Finance Title Insurance
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.