The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Supreme Court Will Decide If Overfunded Pension Plans May Be Sued

Carlton Fields attorney Lowell Walters was quoted in a Society for Human Resources Management article, “Supreme Court Will Decide If Overfunded Pension Plans May Be Sued,” about the U.S. Supreme Court’s upcoming decision on whether overfunding inhibits plan participant’s claim of breach fiduciary duty.

In the case Thole v. U.S. Bank, a defined benefits plan was invested only in stocks, and when the plan lost money in the Great Recession and was therefore underfunded, plan participants sued. After a substantial contribution to the plan resulted in it being overfunded, the case was dismissed.

"In general, plans that have established investment committees that monitor investments throughout the year and try to balance costs with returns and diversifications win these lawsuits," commented Walters. "If Thole v. U.S. Bank is allowed to proceed, the company may be in a good position to come out victorious if it had a prudent process in place for monitoring its investments."

Read the article. (Subscription may be required).