Skip to Content

Florida Supreme Court’s Advisory Opinion on Amendment 4 is a ‘Triumph of the Text’

Carlton Fields Shareholder D. Matthew Allen authored an opinion article in the Tampa Bay Times explaining why he believes the Florida Supreme Court correctly interpreted the law in a recent advisory opinion on Amendment 4, which concerns the voting rights of convicted felons who have completed their sentences.

The court interpreted the phrase “all terms of sentence” in the voter-approved amendment to mean that felons must pay all assigned fines, restitution, and fees before their voting rights are restored following a completed prison sentence. The Tampa Bay Times editorial board criticized the decision for “ignoring the voters’ clear intent.” In his response, Allen wrote that the court objectively interpreted the text of the law. 

“Here, the court used the tools of legal analysis — language and logic — to conclude that ‘all terms of sentence’ had only one natural meaning — referring to all obligations, including monetary ones, not just prison time,” Allen wrote. 

READ: Tampa Bay Times, “Florida Supreme Court’s advisory opinion on Amendment 4 is a ‘triumph of the text’

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.