Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Justices Grapple With Harm Line in FCRA Class Standing Row

Carlton Fields Shareholder Aaron Weiss was quoted in a Law360 article, “Justices Grapple With Harm Line in FCRA Class Standing Row,” regarding a recent Supreme Court oral argument that asked how to apply Article III standing requirements to absent class members.

Weiss opined that the arguments "made one thing clear: this is indeed a complicated case."

"Justice Kavanaugh's discussion of likely standing for at least the approximately 1,800 class members whose credit reports were actually disseminated and Justice Sotomayor's discussion of ... [how] Mr. Ramirez's unusually unfortunate circumstances at trial were the product of a strategic decision by counsel with respect to evidentiary objections (or lack thereof) were areas the Court could potentially look to if they choose to find a narrow consensus opinion," said Weiss.

Read the article. (Subscription may be required).

Featuring
Related Practices
Litigation and Trials