Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Neal McAliley Quoted in Bloomberg Law: “Supreme Court Wetlands Ruling Imperils Waters on Public Lands”
August 03, 2023

Neal McAliley was quoted in a Bloomberg Law article titled “Supreme Court Wetlands Ruling Imperils Waters on Public Lands.” The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Sackett v. EPA, which some argue leaves wetlands and waterways in national parks, monuments, forests and other federal public lands vulnerable to pollution and development. Others believe the ruling will not affect federal lands because the federal government already controls permitting there.

“Activities on federal lands require approval by a federal agency,” said McAliley. “Federal actions are subject to NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, and other laws that require the agencies to consider the environmental effects of their actions.”

Read the article. Subscription may be required.
Featuring
Image: Neal McAliley
Neal McAliley
Related Practices
Environmental, Land Use & Development Approvals and Litigation