• Erin J. Hoyle
  • 813.229.4348
  • Share Share this page
Erin J. Hoyle

Erin J. Hoyle



Erin Hoyle advises clients on data privacy and cybersecurity matters, including data breach and similar cyber incident preparation and response, related attorney general investigations, and further action stemming from those incidents. 

In addition to Erin’s privacy and cybersecurity practice, she represents companies and individuals in government and criminal investigations and conducts internal investigations. Her experience in this area includes government contracting fraud, cybercrime, trade secret misappropriation, theft of government property, health care, bribery of public officials, securities, public company accounting, and compliance with professional standards of conduct. The internal investigations have been prompted by government enforcement proceedings, as well as company-initiated investigations based on suspected wrongdoing by employees, competitors, and other third parties.

Erin also defends companies, executives, and employees in False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam/whistleblower actions, FCA investigations, and advises on whistleblower complaints. These matters include federal anti-kickback and Stark Law violations, as well as employer retaliation claims. She further counsels companies on how to best avoid and detect potential FCA violations, and how to most effectively respond when nonetheless faced with such allegations.

Before joining the firm, Erin worked in academic fundraising, preparing state universities for national fundraising campaigns. She now advises educational institutions on an array of sensitive matters, including employment issues, records retention, student safety, administrative best practices, and compliance.

Featured Insights


  • United States v. HPC Healthcare, Inc., 723 F. App’x 783 (11th Cir. 2018). The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal with prejudice of a qui tam action brought against our client for the alleged fraudulent submission of medical billing to Medicare and Medicaid. The Eleventh Circuit agreed that the plaintiff had failed to plead detailed allegations sufficient to satisfy the applicable standards under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).
  • United States v. Advanced Anesthesia. Relator’s complaint dismissed with prejudice.

All Insights


  • The Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch, Commercial Litigation, Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Health Care Law, Litigation – Securities, Technology Law (2021–2024)

Professional & Community Involvement

  • Women's White Collar Defense Association
    • Young Professionals Committee
    • Rankings and Endorsements Committee
  • National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
  • Tampa Connection
    • Director

Speaking Engagements

  • "When the Government Comes Knocking: Managing Investigations of Senior Executives, Protecting Privilege, and Navigating Ethical Dilemmas," Association of Corporate Counsel CLO/GC Corporate Counsel Joint Symposium, Orlando, FL (November 3, 2023)
  • "Internal Investigations and the Attorney Client Privilege," Client Presentation (March 7, 2023)
  • “The Essentials of Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege ,” Federal Bar Association (November 23, 2022)
  • “Attorney-Client Privilege & Work Product Doctrine for In-House Counsel,” Association of Corporate Counsel, Tampa Bay Chapter, Longboat Key, FL (August 2022)
  • “Attorney-Client Privilege & Work Product Doctrine for In-House Counsel,” Federal Bar Association (October 20, 2021)
  • “A Day at the Beach? Preventing and Defending False Claims Act Complaints Through Compliance,” Association of Corporate Counsel, Tampa Bay Chapter, Longboat Key, FL (August 2021)
  • “Attorney-Client Privilege & Work Product Doctrine for In-House Counsel,” Client Presentation (June 29, 2021)
  • "When the Government Comes Knocking," Client Presentation (March 4, 2021)
  • “Maintaining Privilege: A Refresher on Attorney-Client Privilege for the Remote Work Environment,” Association of Corporate Counsel, Tampa Bay Chapter, St. Petersburg, FL (November 2020)
  • “Legal Considerations and Response to an Information Security Incident,” 2019 Cyber Security Symposium, Tampa, FL (October 2019)
  • “Advising Boards & Management: Ethical Rules & Professional Liability Risks of Corporate Counsel on Advancement and Indemnification,” Association of Corporate Counsel, Tampa Bay Chapter, St. Petersburg, FL (May 2019)
  • “Best Practices for Effective Compliance Programs,” Association of Corporate Counsel, Tampa Bay Chapter, Longboat Key, FL (November 2018)
  • “Avoiding Broken Glass: When the Government Comes Knocking,” Association of Corporate Counsel, West Central Florida Chapter, St. Petersburg, FL (April 2018)
  • “Painting a Compliance Picture in a False Claims Landscape,” Association of Corporate Counsel, West Central Florida Chapter, St. Petersburg, FL (May 2017)


  • Stetson University College of Law (J.D., summa cum laude, 2015)
    • Editor in Chief, Stetson Law Review
  • George Washington University (M.A., 2005)
  • Florida State University (B.A., cum laude, 2003)
Bar Admissions
  • Florida
Court Admissions
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
  • Florida State Courts


  • Independent Consultant, St. Petersburg, FL (2011–2012)
  • Florida State University Foundation, Tallahassee, FL
    • Interim Chief of Staff (2011)
    • Director of Research and Prospect Management (2008–2011)
    • Director of Research (2007–2008)
    • Senior Research Analyst (2007)
    • Research Analyst (2005–2007)


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.